Should I expose my Active Directory to the public Internet for remote users? If you're trying to convince management, A good start would be that: It goes against Microsoft's Best Practices for Active Directory Deployment. Update : See this technet article on securing domain controllers against attack, and the section titled Perimeter Firewall Restrictions that states: Perimeter firewalls should be configured to block outbound connections. Internet. And the section titled Blocking Internet Access for Domain Controllers which states: Launching web browsers on domain controllers should be prohibited not only. Internet. I'm sure you can drum up some Microsoft documentation on the matter, so that's that. In addition to that, you could state the hazards of such a move, something along the lines of: A gaping hole would be created, possibly resulting in severe data loss and/or loss of company secrets. Cached credentials are just that - - cached. They work for the local machine when it can't connect to the domain, but if that account were disabled they would not work for any network resource (svn, vpn, smb, fbi,cia, etc) so they need not worry about that. Also remember that users already have full rights over any files in their profile folder on a local machine anyway (and likely removable media) so disabled credentials or not they can do what they please with that data. BTW, I also think it is VERY EASY to say DOMAIN CONTROLLER == ACTIVE DIRECTORY, which isn't quite the case. AD FS proxies and other means (forms based auth for OWA. In this article, we will review how to change your domain's nameservers. Our nameservers are: ns.inmotionhosting.com ns2.inmotionhosting.com. DNS, BIND, DHCP, LDAP and Directory Services. The DNS Analyzer is a tool to analyze DNS traffic from tcpdump/libpcap trace files. They also wouldn't work for the local machine once it reconnects to the network. Are you referring to the services that Active Directory or a Domain Controller provides, such as LDAP? If so, LDAP is often broken out securely for purposes of authentication and directory querying, but just turning off the Windows Firewall (or opening all the required ports up to the public - Same thing in this example) could cause severe problems. AD doesn't truly manage Macs, so a seperate solution would be required (think OS X Server). You can join a Mac to a domain but that does little more than let them auth with network credentials, set domain admins as local admins on the mac, etc. No group policy. MS is trying to breach that ground with newer versions of SCCM that claim to be able to deploy applications to macs and *nix boxes, but I've yet to see it in a production environment. I also believe you could configure the macs to connect to OS X Server which would authenticate to your AD based directory, but I could be wrong. That being said, some creative solutions could be devised, such as Evan's suggestion for using Open. VPN as a service, and disabling the machine cert if/when the time comes to let that employee go. It sounds like everything is Google based, so Google is acting as your ldap server? I would recommend my client keep it that way if at all possible.I don't know the nature of your business, but for web based apps such as a git or redmine server, even when setup in house can authenticate with OAuth, taking advantage of a Google account. Microsoft Wireless Mouse 6000 Update Internet . Lastly, a roadwarrior setup such as this would almost require a VPN to be successful. Once the machines are brought into the office and configured (or configured remotely by way of script), they need a way of receiving any changes in configuration. The macs would need a separate management approach in addition to the VPN, it's too bad they don't make real mac servers anymore, but they did have some decent policy implementations in OS X Server the last time I checked (a couple of years ago). Dynamically register DNS (host record) entry into Windows DNS server and BIND.I have a Cent. OS machine and two DNS servers (one Windows and other BIND running on another Cent.OS box). I would like to know if it possible to have the Cent.OS box register its hostname with both the Windows name server and the BIND name server.I am only looking to register a host A record in both DNS servers. Avg 2011 11 20 Build 31525 . Currently, when I bring a new Cent. OS box online on my network, I have to statically assign the host record and I would like to know if this can be dynamically registered from the Cent.OS box. I know this is possible for both Windows and Mac OS..Any help would be great! Marvel Vs Capcom For Kawaks Download Skype .
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |